1. Puerto B, Creus M, Carmona F, Civico S, Vanrell JA, Balasch J. Ultrasonography as a
predictor of embryo implantation after in vitro
2. fertilization: a controlled study. Fertil Steril. 2003 Apr;79(4):1015-22
3. Yu Ng EH, Wai Chan CC, Tang OS, Biu Yeung WS, Ho PC: The role of endometrial and
subendometrial blood flows measured by three- dimensional power Doppler ultrasound in
prediction of pregnancy during IVF treatment. Hum Reprod 2005. (Epub ahead of print).
4. Friedler S, Schenker JG, Herman A, Lewin A. The role of ultrasonography in the evaluation
of endometrial receptivity following assisted reproductive treatments: a critical review. Hum
Reprod Update. 1996 Jul-Aug;2(4):323-35.
5. Dietterich C, Check JH, Lurie D,Jung K, et al: The relationship of color and power doppler
ultrasound parameters of pulsatility and resistance indices and sub-endometrial blood flow with endometrial thickness on day of oocyte retrieval and their relationship to clinical
pregnancy rate. Fertility and Sterility, Volume 80, Supplement 3, September 2003, Page 121.
6. Ng EH, Chan CC, Tang OS, Yeung WS, Ho PC. Comparison of endometrial and
subendometrial blood flow measured by three-dimensional power Doppler ultrasound
between stimulated and natural cycles in the same patients.Hum Reprod. 2004 Oct;
19(10):2385-90.
7. Raine-Fenning NJ, Campbell BK, Kendall NR, Clewes JS, Johnson IR. Quantifying the
changes in endometrial vascularity throughout the normal menstrual cycle with threedimensional
power Doppler angiography. Hum Reprod. 2004 Feb;19(2):330-8.
8. Salle B, Bied-Damon V, Benchaib M, Desperes S, Gaucherand P, Rudigoz RC. Preliminary
report of an ultrasonography and colour Doppler uterine score to predict uterine receptivity in
an in-vitro fertilization programme. Hum Reprod. 1998 Jun;13(6):1669-73.
9. Friedler S, Schenker JG, Herman A, Lewin A. The role of ultrasonography in the evaluation
of endometrial receptivity following assisted reproductive treatments: a critical review. Hum
Reprod Update. 1996 Jul-Aug;2(4):323-35.
10. Gonen Y, Casper RF. Prediction of implantation by the sonographic appearance of the
endometrium during controlled ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization. J In Vitro Fert
Embryo Transfer 1990: 7:146-52
11. Zaidi J, Campbell S, Pittrof R, Tan SL. Endometrial thickness, morphology, vascular
penetration and velocimetry in predicting implantation in an in vitro fertilization program.
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1995 Sep;6(3):191-8.
12. Steer CV, Campbell S, Tan SL, et al. The use of transvaginal color flow imaging after in vitro
fertilization to identify optimum uterine conditions before embryo transfer. Fetil Steril 1992; 57: 372-6
13. Coulam CB, Stern JJ, Soenksen DM, Britten S, Bustillo M. Comparison of pulsatility indices
on the day of oocyte retrieval and embryo transfer.Hum Reprod. 1995 Jan;10(1):82-4.
14. Schild RL, Knobloch C, Dorn C, Fimmers R, van der Ven H, Hansmann M. Endometrial
receptivity in an in vitro fertilization program as assessed by spiral artery blood flow,
endometrial thickness, endometrial volume, and uterine artery blood flow. Fertil Steril. 2001
Feb;75(2):361-6.
15. Veek L. The morphological assessment of human oocytes and early concepti. In: Keel BA.
Webster BW. Eds. Handbook of the laboratory diagnosis and treatment of infertility. Boca
Raton. FL: CRC Press. 1990: 353-69
16. Biljan M M: Ultrasound in ART in: Gardner D, Weissman A, Howles CM, Shoham Z:
Textbook of Assisted Reproductive Thechniques.2nd ed. Taylor & Francis, London 2004:
685-704
17. Gonen Y, Calderon I, Dirnfeld M, Abramovici H. The impact of sonographic assessment of
the endometrium and meticulous hormonal monitoring during natural cycles in patients with
failed donor artificial insemination. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 1991 Mar 1;1(2):122-6.
18. Khalifa E, Brzyski RG, Oehninger S, Acosta AA, Muasher SJ Sonographic appearance of the
endometrium: the predictive value for the outcome of in-vitro fertilization in stimulated
cycles. Hum Reprod. 1992 May;7(5):677-80
19. Wu HM, Chiang CH, Huang HY, Chao AS, Wang HS, Soong YK. Detection of the
subendometrial vascularization flow index by three-dimensional ultrasound may be useful for
predicting the pregnancy rate for patients undergoing in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer.
Fertil Steril. 2003 Mar; 79(3):507-11.
20. Smith B, Porter R, Ahuja K, Craft I. Ultrasonic assessment of endometrial changes in
stimulated cycles in an in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer program. J In Vitro Fertil
Embryo Transf 1984; 1:233-8
21. Serafini P, Batzofin J, Nelson J, Olive D. Sonographic uterine predictors of pregnancy in
women undergoing ovulation induction for assisted reproductive treatments. Fertil Steril
1994; 62: 815-22
22. Kurjak A, Chervenak FA: Textbook of ultrasound in obstetrics & Gynecology, 1st ed. New
Dehli: Jaypee Brothers. 2004:639-697.
)