مقایسه طرحواره نقش جنسیتی زوجین، در دو گروه از زنان با و بدون همسرآزاری مراجعه کننده به مراکز بهداشتی درمانی شهر مشهد در سال 1394

نوع مقاله : اصیل پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 مربی گروه مامایی، دانشکده پرستاری و مامایی، دانشگاه علوم پزشکی مشهد، مشهد، ایران.

2 دانشجوی کارشناسی ارشد مامایی، دانشکده پرستاری و مامایی، دانشگاه علوم پزشکی مشهد، مشهد، ایران.

3 استاد آمار زیستی، مرکز تحقیقات نوزادان، دانشکده بهداشت، دانشگاه علوم پزشکی مشهد، مشهد، ایران.

4 استادیار روانشناسی بالینی، مرکز تحقیقات روان‌پزشکی و علوم رفتاری، بیمارستان ابن سینا، دانشکده پزشکی، دانشگاه علوم پزشکی مشهد، مشهد، ایران.

چکیده

مقدمه: همسرآزاری اشاره به خشونتی دارد که از جانب شریک زندگی رخ داده و یا در حال انجام است. طرحواره نقش جنسیتی مجموعه‌ای از باورهای فرد در مورد هویت زنانه یا مردانه است، بنابراین می‌تواند بر روابط افراد تأثیرگذار باشد. مطالعه حاضر با هدف مقایسه طرحواره نقش جنسیتی زوجین در زنان با و بدون همسرآزاری مراجعه کننده به مراکز بهداشتی درمانی شهر مشهد انجام شد.
روش‌کار: این مطالعه تحلیلی - مقایسه‌ای در سال 1394 بر روی 257 زوج مراجعه کننده به مراکز بهداشتی درمانی شهر مشهد انجام گرفت. ابزارهای پژوهش شامل پرسشنامه‌های نقش جنسیتی بم و همسرآزاری ISA بود. با استفاده از پرسشنامه همسرآزاری، زوجین در دو گروه با و بدون همسرآزاری قرار گرفتند و با استفاده از پرسشنامه بم نمرات زنانگی، مردانگی و خنثی در زن و مرد تعیین شدند. تجزیه و تحلیل داده‌ها با استفاده از نرم‌افزار آماری SPSS (نسخه 16) و آزمون‌های کای‌اسکوئر، فیشر، تی‌مستقل و من‌ویتنی انجام شد. میزان p‌ کمتر از 05/0 معنی‌دار در نظر گرفته شد.
یافته‌ها: میانگین نمره زنانگی و مردانگی در مردان گروه بدون همسرآزاری نسبت به گروه دیگر با اختلاف معناداری بیشتر بود (015/0=p، 013/0=p). میانگین نمره خنثی در مردان بدون همسرآزاری نسبت به گروه دیگر با اختلاف معناداری کمتر بود (024/0=p).
نتیجه‌گیری: صفات زنانگی در کنار ویژگی‌های مردانگی، در مردان باعث می‌شود کمتر مرتکب همسرآزاری شوند و صفات خنثی در مردان عامل خطری برای همسرآزاری محسوب می‌شود.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Comparison of Gender schemas of Couples in women with and without Spouse abuse referred to Health Care Centers in Mashhad in 2015

نویسندگان [English]

  • Shahla Nourani Saadoldin 1
  • Somayyeh Baharshahi 2
  • Habibollah Esmaily 3
  • Negar Asghari Pour 4
1 Lecturer, Department of Midwifery, Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
2 M.Sc. student in Midwifery, Faculty of Nursing and Midwifery, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
3 Professor, Department of Biostatistics, Neonatal Research Center, Faculty of Health, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
4 Assistant Professor, Department of Clinical Psychology, Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences Research Center, Ebne-Sina Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.
چکیده [English]

Introduction: Spouse abuse refers to violence which is occurred or is being occurred from the partner. Gender role schemas is a set of one's beliefs about male or female identity, so it can affect the people's relationships. This study was performed with aim to compare the gender schemas couples in women with and without spouse abuse referred to health care centers in Mashhad.
Methods: This analytical-comparative study was performed on 257 couples referred to Mashhad health care centers in 2015. The tools included: Bem`s Sex-Role Inventory and ISA questionnaire (Index Spouse Abuse). By using ISA questionnaire, the couples were divided into two groups of with and without Spouse abuse, and using Bem questionnaire, the scores of femininity, masculinity and undifferentiated in women and men were determined. Data were analyzed by SPSS software (version 16), and Chi-square, Fisher, independent-t and Mann-Whitney tests. P<0.05 was considered significant.
Results: Mean scores of femininity and masculinity in men without spouse abuse were significantly higher than other group (P=0.015) (P=0.013). Mean score of undifferentiated in men without spouse abuse was significantly lower than other group (P=0.024).
Conclusion: Femininity attributes along with masculinity attributes in men decrease spouse abuse. But undifferentiated attributes in men are considered as risk factor for spouse abuse.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Couples
  • Gender roles
  • Spouse abuse

مراجع

  1. Sanjel S. Gender-based violence: a crucial challenge for public health. Kathmandu Univ Med J 2013; 11(2):179–84.
  2. World Health Organization. Violence against women. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2016.
  3. World Health Organization. Global and regional estimates of violence against women Prevalence and health effects of intimate partner violence and non-partner sexual violence. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2013.
  4. World Health Organization. Health care for women subjected to intimate partner violence or sexual violence A clinical handbook. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2014.
  5. Intimate partner violence. Stituation and trends. World Health Organization. Available at: URL: http://www.who.int/gho/women_and_health/violence/intimate_partner/en/; 2016.
  6. Torkashvand F, Rezaeean M, Sheikhfathollahi M, Mehrabian M, Bidaki R, Garousi B, et al. The prevalence of the types of Domestic violence on women referred to health care centers Rafsanjan in 2012. J Rafsanjan Univ Med Sci 2012; 12(9):695–708. (Persian).
  7. Vameghi M, Mohammadreza K, Sajadi H. Domestic violence in Iran: review of 2001-2008 literature. Soc Welfare Quart 2014; 13(50):37–70. (Persian).
  8. Marmion SL. “Intimate” violence against women: when spouses, partners, or lovers attack. 1st ed. Westport: Greenwood Publishing Group; 2006. P. 7.
  9. Davoudi F, Rasoulian M, Ahmadzad Asl M, Nojomi M. Factors associated with physical domestic violence against women in countries of Eastern Mediterranean Region (EMR); a systematic review and metanalysis. Iran J Psych Clin Psychol 2013; 18(4):261-75. (Persian).
  10. Panaghi L, Ghahari S, Ahmadabadi Z, Yoosefi H. Spouse abuse and mental health: the role of social support and coping strategies. J Iran Psychol 2008; 5(17):69–79. (Persian).
  11. Shahrestany M, Doustkam M, Rahbardar H, Mashhadi A. Predicting marital satisfaction over the relational belief and marital intimacy variables in normal and divorced women in Mashhad. J Woman Cult 2011; 4(14):19–41. (Persian).
  12. Young JE, Klosko JS, Weishaar ME. Schema therapy (a practitioner's guide). Trans: Hamidpour H, Andouz Z. Tehran: Arjmand; 2007. P. 29. (Persian).
  13. Bem SL. Gender schema theory: a cognitive account of sex typing. Psychol Rev 1981; 88(4):354–64.
  14. Bem SL. Gender schema theory and its implications for child development: raising gender-aschematic children in a gender-schematic society. J Women Cult Soc 1983; 8(4):598–616.
  15. Maaref M, Khalili S, Hejazi E, Golamali LM. The relationship between identity style, gender role and marital satisfaction in married couples. J Psychol 2015; 18(4):365–80. (Persian).
  16. Hejazi E, Rezadoost Z. Influence of gender & gender roles on friendship patterns. Soc Women 2012; 3(3):57–77. (Persian).
  17. Abolghasemi A, Sheybani H, Narimani M, Gangi M. Relationship of androgyny and neuroticism with quality of life in infertile and fertile women. Womens Stud 2008; 6(2):47–61. (Persian).
  18. Asgari P, Ehteshamzadeh P, Pirzamani S. Relationship of social acceptance, sex-role (androgyny) with psychological well-being in female students of Islamic Azad University branch Andimeshk. Woman Cult 2010; 2(5):99–110. (Persian).
  19. Panaghi L, Ghahari S, Yoosefi H. Violence against wife and its influencing factors from the perspective of the victims of this phenomenon, a qualitative study. J Fam Res 2006; 2(7):257–67. (Persian).
  20. Inanloo M, Mashayekhi F, Haghani H. A study of couples characteristics and existing relations with the kind and severity of wife abuse. Iran J Nurs 1999; 13(26):57-65. (Persian).
  21. Razzaghi N, Tadayyonfar M, Akaberi A. The prevalence of violence against wives and relevant factors in married women admitted to health and treatment clinics in Sabzevar (2007). J Sabzevar Univ Med Sci 2010; 17(1):39-47. (Persian).
  22. Aliakbari M, Mohtashami T, Hasanzadeh P. The study of psychometric characteristics in short form Bem`s Sex-Role Inventory with emphasis on factor analysis in Iranian population. Soc Cogn 2012; 1(1):44–58. (Persian).
  23. Hudson WW, McIntosh SR. The assessment of spouse abuse: two quantifiable dimensions. J Marriage Fam 1981; 43(4):873–88.
  24. Peterson K. Learned resourcefulness, danger in intimate partner relationships, and mental health symptoms of depression and PTSD in abused women. Issues Ment Health Nurs 2013; 34(6):386–94.
  25. Khamsehei A. Study on the sexual behavior and gender role stereotypes of the married college students in iran: comparing sexual behavior of female and male students in the family. J Fam Res 2006; 2(8):327–39. (Persian).
  26. Habibi H, Fatemi M. Study of the relationship between sex and gender role with the level of resiliency. Quart J Psychol Stud 2015; 11(2):115–34. (Persian).
  27. García AO, Calcáneo LM, Soto VS, Lara MR. Correlación entre rasgos de masculinidad-feminidad Y satisfacción marital en migrantes. Migrac Y Desarro 2007; 8:48–65.

Fadaei E, Kanani K, Molavi H, Nouri A. A comparison of neuroticism of Abusive and Non-abusive Husbands and Their characteristics as perceived by their wives in Isfahan, 2007. Knowl Res Appl Psychol 2007; 11(39):67–78. (Persian).

مجله زنان، مامایی و نازایی ایران
دوره 20، شماره 2
اردیبهشت 1396
صفحه 21-30

فایل ها

هم رسانی

ارجاع به این مقاله

آمار