تفاوت در شیوع ساب‌تایپ‌های پاپیلوما ویروس انسانی نسبت به دانسته‌های قبلی بر اساس تکنیک واکنش زنجیره‌ای پلیمراز مولکولی در زنان دارای پاپ‌اسمیر سالم

نوع مقاله : اصیل پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 پزشک عمومی، دانشکده پزشکی، دانشگاه علوم پزشکی آزاد اسلامی واحد تهران، تهران، ایران.

2 استادیار گروه زنان و مامایی، دانشکده پزشکی، دانشگاه علوم پزشکی شهید بهشتی، تهران، ایران.

10.22038/ijogi.2025.85084.6306

چکیده

مقدمه: با توجه به شیوع و عوارض بالای ویروس پاپیلومای انسانی (HPV) و اهمیت بالای تشخیص ابتلاء و نوع ژنوتیپ مسبب و نیز عوامل مؤثر بر آن، مطالعه حاضر با هدف تعیین شیوع HPV و ارتباط آن با خصوصیات جمعیت­شناختی زنان دارای پاپ اسمیر سالم انجام شد.
روشکار: در این مطالعه­ تحلیلی- مقطعی، 225 زن با پاپ‌اسمیر سالم مراجعه­ کننده به بیمارستان ­های تابعه دانشگاه علوم پزشکی آزاد اسلامی تهران در سال­ های 1403-1401، با توجه به معیارهای ورود وارد مطالعه شدند. ابتلاء به HPV و ژنوتیپ آن با روش Real-Time PCR تعیین و ارتباط آن­ها با ویژگی­ های جمعیت ­شناختی بررسی شد. تجزیه و تحلیل داده ­ها با استفاده از نرم ­افزار آماری SPSS (نسخه 23) و آزمون‌های آماری تی استیودنت، من­ ویتنی و کای دو انجام شد. میزان p کم­تر از 05/0 معنی ­دار در نظر گرفته­ شد.
یافته ­ها: در مجموع 63 نفر (0/28%) مبتلا به HPV بودند که بیش­تر افراد یعنی 35 نفر (5/55%) دچار انواع با خطر بالا بودند. در گروه انواع با خطر پایین، ساب­ تایپ 6 (0/25%)، در انواع با خطر متوسط، ساب­ تایپ 53 (8/24%) و 73 (8/24%) و در انواع با خطر بالا، ساب­ تایپ 51 (0/20%)، شایع‌ترین بود. فقط بین سطح تحصیلات با انواع مختلف HPV ارتباط معنی­ داری وجود داشت (037/0=p).
نتیجه ­گیری: شیوع انواع HPV و خصوصاً ساب ­تایپ ­های ناشناخته ­تر (51، 53 و 73) در زنان دارای پاپ اسمیر سالم، قابل توجه بوده که بررسی آن در جوامع مختلف با روش PCR، خصوصاً در افراد با سطح تحصیلات پایین­ تر ضروری است.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

Difference in the Prevalence of Human Papillomavirus Subtypes Compared to Previous Knowledge based on Molecular Polymerase Chain Reaction Technique in Women with Normal Pap Smears

نویسندگان [English]

  • Shayan Sadrinasab 1
  • Mahmoud Pourghadiri Isfahani 1
  • Sadaf Saket 2
  • Saba Saket 1
1 General Practitioner, Faculty of Medicine, Islamic Azad University of Medical Sciences, Tehran Branch, Tehran, Iran.
2 Assistant Professor, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
چکیده [English]

Introduction: Given the high prevalence and complications of human papillomavirus (HPV) and the high importance of diagnosing the infection and the type of causative genotype, as well as the factors affecting it, this study was conducted with aim to determine the prevalence of HPV and its relationship with demographic characteristics of women with normal Pap smears.
Methods: In this cross-sectional analytical study, 225 women with normal Pap smears referred to the hospitals affiliated with Tehran Islamic Azad University of Medical Sciences from 2022 to 2024 were included in the study according to the inclusion criteria. HPV infection and its genotype were determined by Real-Time PCR method and their relationship with demographic characteristics was examined. Data were analyzed by SPSS software (version 23) and student t, Mann-Whitney, and Chi-square tests. P<0.05 was considered significant.
Results: In total, 63 subjects (28.0%) were infected with HPV, most of whom (n=35, 55.5%) had high-risk types. In the low-risk group, subtype 6 (25%), in the intermediate-risk group, subtypes 53 (24.8%) and 73 (24.8%), and in the high-risk group, subtype 51 (20%) were the most common. There was only a significant association between education level and different HPV types (p=0.037).
Conclusion: The prevalence of HPV types, especially the less known subtypes (51, 53, and 73), in women with healthy Pap smears was significant, and it is necessary to investigate it in different communities, especially in people with lower education level, by PCR method.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Human papillomavirus
  • Molecular polymerase chain reaction
  • Pap smear
  1. Afrooz N, Nasiri S, Aminimoghaddam S. Comparison of PFS-OS between two treatment methods (surgery and then chemotherapy compared with neoadjuvant and then surgery) in patients with endometrial cancer: a retrospective study. Iranian Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Infertility 2022; 25(11):26-33.
  2. Felix AS, Yang HP, Bell DW, Sherman ME. Epidemiology of endometrial carcinoma: etiologic importance of hormonal and metabolic influences. Molecular Genetics of Endometrial Carcinoma 2017: 3-46.
  3. Suidan RS, He W, Sun CC, Zhao H, Fleming ND, Ramirez PT, et al. Impact of body mass index and operative approach on surgical morbidity and costs in women with endometrial carcinoma and hyperplasia. Gynecologic oncology 2017; 145(1):55-60.
  4. Rezaianzadeh A, Dehghani SL, Mousavi M, Rezaeianzadeh R. The incidence of uterus cancer in Iran: a systematic review. Women’s Health Bulletin 2017; 4(1):1-4.
  5. Kadkhodayan S, Maleki A, Hasanzadeh M, Yousefi Z. Prevalence of endometrial cancer in young patients. Tehran University of Medical Sciences Journal 2018; 76(5):331-7.
  6. Savelli L, Testa AC, Mabrouk M, Zannoni L, Ludovisi M, Seracchioli R, et al. A prospective blinded comparison of the accuracy of transvaginal sonography and frozen section in the assessment of myometrial invasion in endometrial cancer. Gynecologic Oncology 2012; 124(3):549-52.
  7. Seilanian TF, Hasanzade S, Hasanzadeh Mofrad M, Khoroushi F, Aminzade B, Fathabadi A. Diagnostic Value of Dynamic Magnetic Resonance Imaging with Diffusion Weighted Imaging in the Staging of Endometrial Carcinoma. The Iranian Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Infertility 2022; 25(5):18-25.
  8. Yeganeh Z, Sheikhan Z, Hajian P, Esteki T, Nasiri M, Khodakarami N. Relationship between duration of breast feeding and endometrial cancer: a case-control study. The Iranian Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Infertility 2020; 23(8):58-65.
  9. Hoseini SS, Yousefi Z, Emadzadeh M, Shandiz FH, Hokmabadi P, Salehi M, et al. Changes in prevalence and epidemiology of female genital cancers in northeastern Iran in a 35-year study. The Iranian Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Infertility 2020; 22(12):11-8.
  10. Yeganeh Z, Sheikhan Z, Kariman NO, Hajian P, Nasiri MA. Relationship between gestational diabetes and endometrial cancer. The Iranian Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Infertility 2019; 22(3):49-58.
  11. Hamidi Layen A, Yousefi Z, Davachi B, Jafarian AH, Morovatdar N, Azimi H, et al. Epidemiological findings and risk factors for endometrial cancer patients. The Iranian Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Infertility 2019; 22(1):20-5.
  12. Rashidi Fakari F, Saei Ghare Naz M, Ghasemi V, Riazi H, Afrakhteh M, Keshavarz Z. Relationship between serum lipids and endometrial cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. The Iranian Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Infertility 2018; 21(5):87-96.
  13. Phukan PK, Dutta A, Deuri A, Choudhury G, Borpujari P, Bhattacharyya N, et al. Prevalence of 14 high-risk human papillomavirus subtypes among volunteers of cervical cancer screening by Papanicolaou smear cytology from a tertiary care institute of Assam, India. Annals of Oncology Research and Therapy 2025; 5(1):56-62.
  14. Ortiz Segarra J, Vega Crespo B, Campoverde Cisneros A, Salazar Torres K, Delgado López D, Ortiz S. Human papillomavirus prevalence and associated factors in indigenous women in Ecuador: a cross-sectional analytical study. Infectious Disease Reports 2023; 15(3):267-78.
  15. Ghaffari P, Jansar R, Zol-Adl M, Ghadami R. Prevalence of Human Papillomavirus in Women with Abnormal Pap smear Referred to Shahid Mofatteh Clinic by Multiplex PCR & Reverse Dot Blot Hybridization in Yasuj, Iran. Armaghane Danesh 2021; 26(3):417-28.
  16. Baddal B, Oktay MN, Bostanci A, Yenen MC. Prevalence and genotype screening of human papillomavirus among women attending a private hospital in Northern Cyprus: an 11-year retrospective study. BMC Women's Health 2023; 23(1):297.
  17. Alışkan HE, Toprak U. Determination of Human Papilloma Virus (HPV) Genotype Prevalance and Distrubution in Adana: A Hospital-Based Study between 2014-2021. Mikrobiyoloji Bulteni 2023; 57(1):119-33.