Early maternal complications of cesarean section in two technique of Closure and non-closure of parietal peritoneum: a double blind randomized clinical trial

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 M.Sc. Student of Operating Room, Student Research Committee, School of Paramedicine, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran.

2 Assistant professor, Department of Operating Room, School of Paramedicine, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran.

3 Assistant professor, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Faculty of Medicine, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran.

Abstract

Introduction: Cesarean section is performed with two technique of closure or non-closure of the peritoneum, but there is disagreement about the advantages and disadvantages of these techniques. Accordingly, this study was performed with aim to compare the early maternal complications of cesarean section in two technique of closure or non-closure of the parietal peritoneum.
Methods: This double-blind randomized clinical trial study was performed on 120 patients undergoing cesarean section at Hamadan Fatimah Hospital in 2019. Samples were randomly divided into two groups: closure of the peritoneum (n=60) and non-closure of the peritoneum (n=60). The maternal complications during and after surgery were recorded. Data were analyzed by SPSS software (version 21) and Chi-square, independent t-test and repeated measures.
Results: The results showed that operative time and bleeding during surgery were significantly fewer in patients receiving non-closure technique (p<0.05). Also, the duration of ileus, the amount of received analgesic, and pain 12 and 24 hours after the surgery were significantly lower in patients receiving non-closure technique (p <0.05). However, there was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of pain after 6 hours of the surgery and the symptoms of surgical wound infection (p> 0.05).
Conclusion: The complications such as bleeding during surgery, the duration of surgery, ileus after surgery, pain, and consumption of analgesic will occurs with less intensity in patients receiving non-closure technique than patients with closure technique; however, these two methods were not different in terms of surgical wound infection.

Keywords

References

  1. Pacher J, Brix E, Lehner R. The mode of delivery in patients with preeclampsia at term subject to elective or emergency Cesarean section. Archives of gynecology and obstetrics 2014; 289(2):263-7.
  2. Moradan S, Agha Amoo S, Mirmohammad Khani M, Pourzand B. Maternal complications of repeated cesarean section, comparison of second cesarean with more than twice cesarean sections. Iran J Obstet Gynecol Infertil 2017; 19(38):7-12.
  3. Martin JA, Hamilton BE, Osterman MJ, Driscoll AK, Drake P. National vital statistics reports. National Center for Health Statistics 2018.
  4. Ahmadi Y, Sharififar S , Pishgooie SAH, Teimouri F, Hoseyni MS, Yari M. Comparison of Quality of life in Postpartum Mothers Undergone Cesarean and Vaginal Delivery in Selected Hospitals of Tehran in 2015. Military Caring Sciences Journal 2017; 3(4):242-8.
  5. Cunningham F, Leveno K, Bloom S, Spong CY, Dashe J. Williams obstetrics. 24nd ed. Mcgraw-hill; 2014.
  6. Creanga AA, Bateman BT, Butwick AJ, Raleigh L, Maeda A, Kuklina E, et al. Morbidity associated with cesarean delivery in the United States: is placenta accreta an increasingly important contributor? Am J Obstet Gynecol 2015; 213(3):384.e1-11.
  7. Boskabadi H, Zakerihamidi M, Bagheri F. Outcomes of vaginal delivery and cesarean in Mashhad Ghaem University Hospital. Tehran University Medical Journal 2014; 71(12).
  8. Tabasi Z, Mahdian M, Abedzadeh-Kalahroudi M. Closure or non-closure of peritoneum in cesarean section: outcomes of short-term complications. Archives of trauma research 2013; 1(4):176.
  9. Demirel Y, Gursoy S, Duran B, Erden O, Cetin M, Balta O, et al. Closure or nonclosure of the peritoneum at gynecological operations. Effect on postoperative pain. Saudi Med J 2005; 26(6):964-8.
  10. Rafique Z, Shibli KU, Russell IF, Lindow SW. A randomised controlled trial of the closure or non‐closure of peritoneum at caesarean section: effect on post‐operative pain. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology 2002; 109(6):694-8.
  11. Poddar S, Tripathy S. Double-blind Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing the Effect of Closure vs Nonclosure of Peritoneum during Cesarean Section on Postoperative Pain. Journal of South Asian Federation of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 2019; 11(3):167-71.
  12. Avantika S, Nupur H, Meena B, Apoorv S, Smriti B, Bhomraj K. Postoperative Outcome of Caesarean Section in Closure of Peritoneum with Different Suture Materials. Scholars Academic Journal of Biosciences 2017; 5(2):118-20.
  13. Ghorbani R, Eslami M. Comparison of outcomes between closure versus non-closure visceral and parietal peritoneum during cesarean section: A randomized clinical trial. Iran J Obstet Gynecol Infertil 2014; 16(90):10-5.
  14. Yu CN, Chow TK, Kwan AS, Wong SL, Fung SC. Intra-operative blood loss and operating time in orthognathic surgery using induced hypotensive general anaesthesia: prospective study. Hong Kong Med J 2000 ;6(3):307-11.
  15. Deshpande H, Burute SB, Madkar CS, Dahiya P. The effect of suturing and nonsuturing of visceral and parietal peritoneum on postoperative pain in caesarean section. Int J Pharm Biomed Sci 2012; 3(4):164-6.
  16. Ghongdemath JS, Banale SB. A randomized study comparing non-closure and closure of visceral and parietal peritoneum during cesarean section. The Journal of obstetrics and Gynecology of India 2011; 61(1):48-52.
  17. Bamigboye AA, Hofmeyr GJ. Closure versus non-closure of the peritoneum at caesarean section: short- and long-term outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014; (8):CD000163.
  18. Galaal KA, Krolikowski A. A randomized controlled study of peritoneal closure at cesarean section. Saudi Med J 2000; 21(8):759-61.
  19. Huchon C, Raiffort C, Chis C, Messaoudi F, Jacquemot MC, Panel P. La césarienne: avec ou sans péritonisation? Etude randomisée de la morbidité postopératoire [Caesarean section: closure or non-closure of peritoneum? A randomized trial of postoperative morbidity]. Gynecol Obstet Fertil 2005; 33(10):745-9.
  20. Kurek Eken M, Özkaya E, Tarhan T, İçöz Ş, Eroğlu Ş, Kahraman ŞT, et al. Effects of closure versus non-closure of the visceral and parietal peritoneum at cesarean section: does it have any effect on postoperative vital signs? A prospective randomized study. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2017; 30(8):922-926.
  21. Ghorbani R, Eslami M. Comparison of outcomes between closure versus non-closure visceral and parietal peritoneum during cesarean section: A randomized clinical trial. The Iranian Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Infertility. 2014;16(90):10-5.
  22. Atabekoğlu CS, Türkçüoğlu I, Duru B, Sönmezer M, Süer G, Uysalel A, et al. Closure vs non-closure of peritoneum at caesarean section: evaluation of pain. J Obstet Gynaecol 2011; 31(4):307-10.
  23. Rahmani Boeni N, Khalilian AR, Alvandipour M, Sayadi S. The effects of intera-peritoneal bupivacaine on post operative bowel motility and pain. Journal of Mazandaran University of Medical Sciences 2012; 22(88):89-94.
  24. Malek-Mellouli M, Ibrahima S, Ben Amara F, Néji K, Bouchneck M, Youssef A, et al. Vers une simplification de la technique de césarienne : suture péritonéale ou non ? [Towards a simplification of caesarean section technique: non-closure of peritoneum?]. J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris) 2011; 40(6):541-8.
  25. Almassi Nokiani F, Veissi F, Rezaei M, Akbari HO, Khavaran P. Comparison of Early Results of Closure and Non-closure of Visceral Peritoneum in Cesarean Section. Razi Journal of Medical Sciences 2010; 17(71):27-33.
  26. Malomo OO, Kuti O, Orji EO, Ogunniyi SO, Sule SS. A randomised controlled study of non-closure of peritoneum at caesarean section in a Nigerian population. J Obstet Gynaecol 2006; 26(5):429-32.
  27. Fahmy MM, Saleh SA, El-Khouly NI, Zahrane RA. Short-term effect of closure versus non-closure of peritoneum at cesarean section. Life Science Journal 2015; 12(2):60-3.
The Iranian Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Infertility
Volume 24, Issue 1
March 2021
Pages 77-86

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics