A pregnant patient with extensive myocardial infarction: a case report

Document Type : Case report

Authors

1 Assistant professor, Department of Cardiovascular, Cardiovascular Research Center, School of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.

2 Resident, Department of Cardiovascular, Cardiovascular Research Center, School of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.

Abstract

Introduction: The incidence of myocardial infarction (MI) during pregnancy is 6 cases per 100000 births which occur more commonly at third trimester. Its maternal morbidity is 19-37% and fetal mortality is 9-13%. Anterior wall is the most common location of myocardial infraction (78%). The risk factors for myocardial infarction during pregnancy included: maternal age >35 year, hypertension, diabetes, smoking, preeclampsia, infections, and thrombophilia. On the other hand, pregnancy is a predisposing factor for coronary artery dissection. In this study, a case of myocardial infarction during pregnancy was reported.
Case report: The patient was a 37 year old pregnant woman with second pregnancy who was admitted with diagnosis of acute anterior ST elevation Myocardial infarction at 37th weeks of gestation. She had received fibrinolytic agent. After performing angiography in referral center, regarding to that the lesion was thrombotic and with good distal run off, antiplatelet and anticoagulant agents was administrated for her. After 12 hours, active labor started, probably because of retroplacental bleeding, and vaginal delivery was performed. With some days delay, percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) was done on the dissected lesion of Left anterior descending artery by using of drug-eluting stent (DES). After 50 days, implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) was implanted for her because of low left ventricular systolic function.
Conclusion: If myocardial infarction occurs in pregnancy, invasive approach (angiography and Coronary stenting and then, continuing the antiplatelet agent is best choice for re-run off. In this patient, according to the angiography result, some thrombosis in LAD artery with good distal run off, antiplatelet and anticoagulant agents were administrated for her and after some days delay, angioplasty was done. If acute myocardial infarction occurs in the center without the procedures of invasive intervention, if the mother's life is threatened, at first, fibrinolytic should be used and then, invasive intervention be performed.

Keywords


  1. Mann DL, Zipes DP, Libby P, Bonow RO. Braunwald's heart disease: a textbook of cardiovascular medicine. New York: Elsevier Health Sciences; 2014.
  2. Camm AJ, Lüscher TF, Serruys PW. The ESC textbook of cardiovascular medicine. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press; 2009.
  3. Safi M, Vakili H, Saadat H, Ramezani J, Ahmadi M. The comparison of intracoronary versus intravenous eptifibatide administration during primary percutaneous coronary intervention of acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Life Sci J 2012; 9(4):215-22.
  4. Jaiswal A, Rashid M, Balek M, Park C. Acute myocardial infarction during pregnancy: a clinical checkmate. Indian Heart J 2013; 65(4):464-8.
  5. Poh CL, Lee CH. Acute myocardial infarction in pregnant women: Ann Acad Med Singapore 2010; 39(3):247-53.
  6. Qasqas SA, McPherson C, Frishman WH, Elkayam U. Cardiovascular pharmacotheraputic considerations during pregnancy and lactation. Cardiol Rev 2004; 12(4):201-21.
  7. Ladner HE, Danielson B, Gilbert WM. Acute myocardial infarction in pregnancy and the puerperium: a population-based study. Obstet Gynaecol 2005; 105(3):480-4.