1. ZABREK M, Edward FA .Can I get pregnant?The basic infertility workup. Clinical obstetrics
and gynecol 1996;39:223-230.
2. Speroff L,Fritez MA. Clinical gynecology redocrinology and infertility .7th edition, USA
Lippincott: Williams & Wilkins; 2005.1054 -55.
3. Keye WR, Chang RJ, Rebar RW.Semen analysis, sperm processing IVF, Techniques in ART
“Evaluation and treatment of infertility” W.B. Sauders Company; 1995. 788 – 789.
4. Berek JS .Novak’s gynecology. 13th edition,.USA Lippincott: Williams & Wilkins; 2002. 973 -
1046
5. Sciarra J, Watkins T J. Gynecology and obstetrics. Philadelphia: Harpeu & Row ;1995. vol
5,chap 67:1 – 8.
6. Nachtigall MJ Schwartz LB. The application of transvaginal ultrasound for evaluation induction
and in vitro fertilization. clinical obstetrics gynecol 1996; 39: 231-247.
7. Zhange X, Chen C.H. Increased endometrial thickness is associated with improved treatment
outcome for selected patients undergoing in vitro fertilization emberyo transfer. Fertile steril,
2005; 83(2): 336-340.
8. Rashidi BH, sadeghi M. Relationships between pregnancy rates following invitro fertilization or
intracytoplasmic sperm injection and endometrial thickness and patterns. Eur J Obstet Gynecol
reprod Biol. 2005; 120(2): 179-184.
9. Ueno J, Oehninger S, Brzyski RG, Acosta AA, philput B, Muasher SJ. Ultrasonographic
appearance of the endometrial in natural and stimulated in – vitro fertilization cycles and its
correlation with outcome. Hum Reprod 1991; 6: 901.
10. Check JH, Nowroozi K, Choe. J, Lurie D, Dietterich C. The effect of endometrial thickness and
echo pattern on in vitro fertilization outcome in donor oocyte – emberyo transfer cycle, Fertil
steril, 1993; 59: 72.
11. Fanchin R, Righinic, Ayoubi J, oliveanes F, dc ziegler D, frydman R,.Newlook at endometrial
echogenicity: objective computer – assisted – embryo transfer,.Fertil steril, 2000; 74: 274.
12. Zaidi J, Campbells P R, Tan SL. Endometrial thickness, morphology, vascular penetration and
velocimetry in predicting implantation in an invitro fertilization program. Ultrasound obstet
gynecol 1995; 6: 191.
13. Khalifa E, Brzyski RG, ochninger s, Acosta AA, muasher SJ,. Sonographic appearance of the
endometrium: the predictive value to the outcome of invitro fertilization in stimulated cycles.
Hum Reprod , 1992; 7: 677.
14. Bassil S. Changes in endometrial thickness width, length and pattern in predicting pregnancy outcome
during ovarian stimulation invitro fertilization. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol, 2001;18: 258.
15. Dickey RP, Olar TT, Curohe DN, Taylor SN, Rye PH. Endometrial pattern and thickness
associated with pregnancy outcome after assisted reproductive technologies. Hum Reprod,
1992; 7:418.
16. Ozcakir HT, Goker EN, Terek MC, Adakans, V M, Levi R, Tavmergen E. Areh Gynecol obstet
2002; 266(1): 18-20.
17. Perry GA, Smith MF, Lucy MC, Green JA, Parks TE, Macneil MD,et al.R elationship between
follicle size and insemination and pregnancy. Success.Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2005; 102
(14):5268 – 5273.
18. Perry GA, Smith MF, Roberts AJ, Maceneil MD, Geary TW. Relationship between size of
ovulatory follicle and pregnancy.
19. success in beef heifers.” J Anim Sci, 2006; Oct 23; [Epub ahead of print].