The Iranian Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Infertility

The Iranian Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Infertility

Financial burden due to non-compliance of ultrasound with national standards in pregnant women with low-risk pregnancy covered by the health centers of Isfahan, 2019

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
Raziye Pourkazemi 1
Mahsa Shaali 2
Reza Rezayatmand 3
1 Phd of Reproductive Health, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
2 M.Sc. of Midwifery, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
3 Associate Professor, Health Management and Economics Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Science, Isfahan, Iran.
10.22038/ijogi.2022.20796
Abstract
Background and Aim: Non-compliance of pregnancy and childbirth care with national guidelines and standards incur a huge financial burden on health system. This study aimed to estimate the financial burden of ultrasound screening for low-risk pregnant women which is not in accordance with national standards.
Methods: This was a cross-sectional study in which 230 pregnant women with low-risk pregnancies, getting care in comprehensive health centers, were assessed in terms of the number of ultrasounds they had during their pregnancy and to see how it would be in accordance with national standards. The financial burden was estimated based on the total fertility rate per year from the perspective of health insurance as well as patients.
Results: The average number of ultrasounds performed in pregnancy per person was 5 times (4 one-dimensional ultrasound and one three-dimensional ultrasound), which is almost twice the defined level of the national standard (3 one-dimensional ultrasound). It was estimated that this imposed a financial burden of about 364,707,521,587 Rials on basic insurers. Also, individuals incur a financial burden of about 2,898,188,006,140 Rials. It meant that following national standard for performing ultrasound examination during low-risk pregnancy would have saved 3260 billion IRR for Iranian health system.
Conclusion: Non-compliance of ultrasound services with national standards is associated with several effects such as imposing additional costs on the family and insurance organizations. Following national standards for prenatal care would stop providing unnecessary services during pregnancy and reduce related costs which would be beneficial both for pregnant women and health system. 
Keywords
Financial burden
Pregnancy
Standard
Ultrasound
  1. Moos MK. Prenatal care: limitations and opportunities. Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic & Neonatal Nursing 2006; 35(2):278-85.
  2. Singh A, Yadav A, Singh A. Utilization of postnatal care for newborns and its association with neonatal mortality in India: an analytical appraisal. BMC pregnancy and childbirth 2012; 12(1):1-6.
  3. Tirkesh F, Bahrami N, Bahrami S. Assessmentof Achievementto Improving Maternal Healthfrom Third Millennium Development Goalin Dezful University of Medical Sciences. Community Health 2015; 2(2):98-105
  4. Ronsmans C, Graham WJ, Lancet Maternal Survival Series steering group. Maternal mortality: who, when, where, and why. The lancet 2006; 368(9542):1189-200.
  5. Esfandiarinezhad P, Najar Sh, Afshari P, Gholami F, Haghighizadeh MH. Evaluation Adaptation Of Presented Prenatal Care With The Standard Of Country In Therapeutic Health Centers Of Ahvaz City In 2011. Journal of Medical Council of I.R.I. 2015; 33(3):217-31.
  6. Kharaghani R, Shariati M, Yunesian M, Keramat A, Moghisi A. The Iranian integrated maternal health care guideline based on evidence-based medicine and American guidelines: A comparative study. Modern Care Journal 2016; 13(2).
  7. Tayebi T, Zahrani ST, Mohammadpour R. Relationship between adequacy of prenatal care utilization index and pregnancy outcomes. Iranian journal of nursing and midwifery research 2013; 18(5):360.
  8. Partridge S, Balayla J, Holcroft CA, Abenhaim HA. Inadequate prenatal care utilization and risks of infant mortality and poor birth outcome: a retrospective analysis of 28,729,765 US deliveries over 8 years. American journal of perinatology 2012; 29(10):787-94.
  9. Sharami SH, Faraji R, Khoramnia S, Dalile Heyrati SF. Survey the reason of maternal request for prenatal ultrasound in low risk pregnancy. Journal of Guilan University of Medical Sciences 2011; 20(78):49-55.
  10. Kharaghani R, Shariati M, Yunesian M, Keramat A, Moghisi A. The Iranian integrated maternal health care guideline based on evidence-based medicine and American guidelines: A comparative study. Mod Care J 2016; 13(2):e9455.
  11. AbouZahr C, Wardlaw T. Antenatal care in developing countries: promises, achievements and missed opportunities-an analysis of trends, levels and differentials, 1990-2001. InAntenatal care in developing countries: promises, achievements and missed opportunities-an analysis of trends, levels and differentials, 1990-2001; 2003:32.
  12. Fullerton JT, Bader J, Nelson C, Shannon R. Participation in prenatal care in the Paso Del Norte border region: the influence of acculturation. Journal of midwifery & women's health 2006; 51(2):98-105.
  13. Ciceklioglu M, Soyer MT, Öcek ZA. Factors associated with the utilization and content of prenatal care in a western urban district of Turkey. International Journal for Quality in Health Care 2005; 17(6):533-9.
  14. Garcia J, Bricker L, Henderson J, Martin MA, Mugford M, Nielson J, Roberts T. Women's views of pregnancy ultrasound: a systematic review. Birth 2002; 29(4):225-50.
  15. Vashishtha VM. The State of the Worlds Children 2009 Maternal Health is the Key to Achieve MDGs 4 and 5. Indian pediatr 2009; 46(3):233-4.
  16. Behdani R, Beigi Ab, Mobaraki N. Ultrasound in determining the gestational age in the first trimester and reducing the rate of late pregnancy. Tehran University Medical Journal 2008; 66(2):123-126.‎
  17. Cunningham FG, Leveno KJ, Bloom SL, Spong CY, Dashe JS, Hoffman BL, et al. Williams Obstetrics. 23nd New York: McGraw-Hill Education; 2014.
  18. Azizi A. The prevalence of the causes of high-risk pregnancies in pregnant women of Sonqor city, 2011. Iran J Obstet Gynecol Infertil 2015; 18(153):10-9.
  19. Kashani E, Hassanzad A, Ameri MA. The rate of the prevalence of high-risk pregnancies and the results on pregnant mothers and the effect on parameters after the birth. Advances in Environmental Biology 2012; 6(3):1319-24.
  20. Sangestani G, Khatiban M. A Survey Of Ultrasound Use In Prenatal Health Care In Iran. Advances in Nursing and Midwifery (Faculty Of Nursing Of Midwifery Quarterly) 2011; 21(74):42-7.
  21. Karimi S, Saghaeiannejad IS, Farzandipour M, Esmaeili GM. Comparative study of minimum data sets of health information management of organ transplantation in selected countries and presenting appropriate solution for Iran 2011; 7(Special issue):497-505.
  22. Delgado-Rodrı́guez M, Gómez-Olmedo M, Bueno-Cavanillas A, Gálvez-Vargas R. Unplanned pregnancy as a major determinant in inadequate use of prenatal care. Preventive medicine 1997; 26(6):834-8.
  23. Stephens MB, Montefalcon R, Lane DA. The maternal perspective on prenatal ultrasound. J Fam Pract 2000; 49(7):601-4.
  24. Kieler H, Haglund B, Cnattingius S, Palmgren J, Axelsson O. Does prenatal sonography affect intellectual performance?. Epidemiology 2005: 304-10.
  25. Hakari D, Mohammadzadeh R, Velayati A, Bolurian M. Surveying the Preventative Factors of Pregnancy Care and its Relationship with the Conclusion of Pregnancy in Women Referring to a number of Tabriz Hospitals. Medical Journal of Islamic Azad University 2011; 3(21):206-13.
  26. Morshedi M, Bakhshandeh M, Piriaei A, Ghadiri H, Norouzian M. Determination of the effect of ultrasound waves used in three-dimensional, four-dimensional and color Doppler ultrasound of the fetus on the growth, proliferation and apoptosis of human skin fibroblast cells. Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences and Health Services. Master Thesis; 2015. Available from: http://dlib.sbmu.ac.ir/site/catalogue/170534.
The Iranian Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Infertility
Volume 25, Issue 5
July 2022
Pages 58-66