Pronatalist Policies and its Role in Pattern of Contraceptive Methods among Women in Reproductive Age in Sanandaj City, 2016

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Associate professor, Department of Population and Health, National Population Studies & Comprehensive Management Institute, Tehran, Iran.

2 M.Sc. in Demography, Allameh Tabatabaie School of Social Sciences, Allameh Tabatabaie University, Tehran, Iran.

Abstract

Introduction: In response to rapid fertility reduction over the recent decades in Iran, pronatalist policies was introduced in 2014 and significant changes has occurred in the family planning programs in the country, while it is not clear enough what influences these policies have had on pattern of using contraceptive methods. This study was performed with aim to determine the role of pronatalist policies in the pattern of using contraceptive methods, as well as the attitudes of women towards changes in the access, quality, cost and advocacy of contraceptive methods after introduction of these polices.
Methods: This descriptive-analytic and comparison study is a population-based survey which was conducted among 454 married women aged 15-49 years in Sanandaj in 2016. Data collection was performed using a researcher-made questionnaire. Last contraception used (n=454) was compared to corresponding method used in the Demographic Health Survey of Kordestan (n=260) in 2010. The women’s attitude towards changes in the provision, quality and cost of contraceptive methods were evaluated and the factors associated to the women’s attitude were also assessed using t-test and Chi-square test. P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Results: Over the period of 2010-2016, the prevalence of modern methods was reduced from 81.2% to 64.7%, while the prevalence of withdrawal method increased from 19% to 36%. A reduction was shown in the prevalence of women's tubal ligation (from 24.4% to 4%). The prevalence of using IUD and condom was clearly increased from 19% to 26.3% and from 11% to 15.1%, respectively. In 2016 survey, a reduction was reported in the access, quality, and advocacy and informing of contraceptive methods and the cost of providing contraceptive methods had increased compared to two years ago from the viewpoints of women at reproductive age. Women from lower socio-economic status were more concerned of rising cost and reduced quality of contraceptive methods.
Conclusion: The pattern of contraceptive methods has been changed from safe to unsafe methods. Adverse health consequences of restriction of family planning due to new population policies will be greater for vulnerable groups of the society that needs more attention by health policymakers and appropriate interventions.

Keywords

References

  1. Abbasi-Shavazi MJ, Hosseini-Chavoshi M. Changes and recent population policies in Iran: The necessity of formulating comprehensive population policy. J Popul Assoc Iran 2012; 7(13):95-117. (Persian).
  2. Abbasi-Shavazi MJ. Below replacement-level fertility in Iran: progress and prospects. Paper prepared for the IUSSP Seminar on: international perspectives on low fertility: Trends, theories and policies, Tokyo; 2001.
  3. Hosseini H, Begi B. Demographic changes, challenges of family Planning programs and policy implications in Iran. J Popul Assoc Iran 2012; 6(12):103-21. (Persian).
  4. Rezaiee M. Underlying factors for low fertility in Kurdistan of Iran, the case of Saghez City. Tehran: Tehran University of Social Science; 2012. (Persian).
  5. Women eligible for receiving free of charge birth spacing-contraceptive services. Ministry of Health & Medical Education. Available at: URL: http://ird.behdasht.gov.ir/; 2015.
  6. Javadkhani H, Motihaghshenas N. Documentation of levels and trends of fertility transition in Iran: differentials in regional developments. 4th Conference of the Association of Population in Iran; Planning and Sustainable Development, Tehran, Iran; 2007. (Persian).
  7. McIntosh C, Alison J, Janson L, Finkle R. The Cairo conference on population and development: a new paradigm? Popul Dev Rev 1995; 21:223-60.
  8. Hajian KO, Asnafi N, Molania-Jelodar F. Trend of contraceptive patterns over the 7 years in rural population of Babol (1994-2000). Gorgan Univ Med Sci 2003; 5(12):19-24. (Persian).
  9. Alipour A, Habibian N, Tabatabaei SH. Evaluation the impact of family physician care program on family planning in Sari from 2003 to 2007. Iran J Epidemiol 2009; 5(1):47-55. (Persian).
  10. Behboudi-Gandevani S, Tehrani FR, Cheraghi L, Noroozzadeh M, Farahmand M, Azizi F. Trends of contraception use among married reproductive age women: Tehran lipid and glucose cohort study 2002–2011. Sex Reprod Healthc 2017; 12:116-22.
  11. Demeny P, McNicoll G, Hodgson D. Encyclopedia of population. Hodgson, Dennis: Contemporary Population Thought; 2003.
  12. Pasha O, Fikree FF, Vermund S. Determinants of unmet need for family planning in squatter Settlements in Karachi Pakistan. Asia Pac Popul J 2001; 16(2):93-108.
  13. Kaushik S. Unmet need for family planning: a comparative analysis of northern and southern states of India based on NFHS data. Presented at the Millennium Conference on Population Development and Environment Nexus, New Delhi, India; 2000.
  14. Stash S. Reasons for unmet  need in Nepal: an attempt to pick up where fertility surveys left off. Presented at the Annual Meeting of the Population Association of American, San Francisco, California; 1995.
  15. Abbasi-Shavazi MJ, Husseini-Chavoshi M, McDonald P, Kavehfirouz Z. A qualitative study of women’s views on fertility behavior in the province of Yazd. J Sco Sci Lett 2002; 20:169-203. (Persian).
  16. Teimoori P. Knowledge, attitude and practice of married men in Sanandaj city about family planning and contraception and influencing factors. Sci J Kurdistan Univ Med Sci 1997; 2(4):12-7. (Persian).
  17. Khalajabadi FF, Heidari J. Male participation in family planning in Zanjan, 2011: a qualitative study. Hakim Res J 2012; 16(1):50-7. (Persian).
  18. McNicoll G. Institutional determinants of fertility change. Popul Dev Rev 1980; 6(3):441-62.
  19. Greenhalgh S. Fertility as mobility: Sinic Transition. Popul Dev Rev 1988; 14(4):629-74.
  20. Rashidian A, Karimi-Shahanjarini A, Khosravi A, Elahi E, Beheshtian M, Shakibazadeh E, et al. Iran's multiple indicator demographic and health survey-2010: Study protocol. Int J Prev Med 2014; 5(5):632.
  21. Rashidian A, Khosravi A, Khabiri R, Khodayari-Moez E, Elahi E, Arab M, et al. Islamic Republic of Iran’s Multiple indicator demograpphic and healh survey (IrMIDHS) 2010. Tehran: Ministry of Health and Medical Education; 2012. P. 83-6.
  22. Khazani S. The role of pro-natalist population policies on the pattern of contraceptive use among married women aged 15-49 years old, (The case of Sanandaj city). Tehran: Allameh Tabatabaiee University, Social Science College; 2016. (Persian).
  23. Hameed W, Azmat SK, Ali M, Sheikh MI, Abbas G, Temmerent M, et al. Women’s empowerment and contraceptive use: the role of independent versus couples’ decision-making, from a lower middle income country perspective. PLoS One 2014; 9(8):e104633.
  24. Erfani A. Family planning and women’s educational advancement in Iran. Can Stud Popul 2015; 42(1-2):35-52.
  25. Li RH, Lo SS, Teh DK, Tong NC, Tsui MH, Cheung KB, et al. Impact of common contraceptive methods on quality of life and sexual function in Hong Kong, Chinese women. Contraception 2004; 70(6):474-82.
  26. Erfani A. Levels, trends, and determinants of unintended pregnancy in Iran: the role of contraceptive failures. Stud Fam Plan 2013; 44(3):299-317.
  27. Erfani A, Yuksel‐Kaptanoglu I. The use of withdrawal among birth limiters in Iran and Turkey. Stud Fam Plan 2012; 43(1):21-32.
  28. Rahnama P, Hidarnia A, Shokravi FA, Kazemnejad A, Oakley D, Montazeri A. Why Iranian married women use withdrawal instead of oral contraceptives? A qualitative study from Iran. BMC Public Health 2010; 10(1):289.
  29. Nadi BM, Nouhjah S, Haghighizadeh MH. The pattern of using family planning methods in women over 35 years old referred to Ahvaz health centers in 2010. Jentashapir J Health Res 2011; 2(4):175-82. (Persian).
The Iranian Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Infertility
Volume 22, Issue 6
August 2019
Pages 20-38

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics