The effect of vibroacoustic and light stimulation on fetal health: A review of the literature

Document Type : Review Article

Authors

1 M.Sc. of Midwifery, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.

2 Assistant Professor, Department of Midwifery, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran.

Abstract

Introduction: One of the essential components of the process of prenatal care is the assessment of the fetal health, for which there are several tests. Recently, in some studies, vibroacoustic stimulation and halogen light have also been evaluated as a test for the evaluation of fetal health. This study was conducted with the aim of systematically summarizing recent studies on the effect of stimulation with vibroacoustic and halogen light on the fetus.
 Materials and Methods: In this review study, in order to retrieve relevant national and international studies published from 1990 to 2017, the researchers extensively searched the following databases: magirin, irandoc, SID، Google scholar, Scopus, PubMed, and science direct. English keywords included “vibroacoustic” and “halogen light”. The papers that had the highest similarity with our review title were entered into the study, and the results were reported.
Results: Finally، 15 papers that investigated the effect of halogen light and vibroacoustic stimulation were studied. There was a correlation between fetal heart rate، fetal health assessment, and stimulation with vibroacoustic and halogen light (P<0.05).
Conclusion: In general، according to the findings of most studies، there is a correlation between the effect of stimulation with vibroacoustic and halogen light and fetal health and fetal movement tests. Since stimulation with vibroacoustic and halogen light reduce the incidence of non-reactive fetal heart rate، this tool can be used safely and effectively in maternal health assessment centers to improve fetal non-stress test.

Keywords

References

  1. Goonewardene M, Hanwellage K. Fetal acoustic stimulation test for early intrapartum fetal monitoring. Ceylon Med J 2011; 56(1):14-8.
  2. Sambarey P, Bilagi DM. Non-stress test and vibroacoustic stimulation test in high-risk pregnancies and its relation to perinatal outcome. Int J Sci Study 2016; 3(11):173-7.
  3. Hoh JK, Park YS, Cha KJ, Park MI. Fetal heart rate after vibroacoustic stimulation. In J Gynecol Obstet 2009; 106(1):14-8.
  4. Sood A. Vibroacoustic stimulation and modified fetal biophysical profile in high risk pregnancy. J Obstet Gynaecol India 2007; 57(1):27-36.
  5. Rahimikian F, Modarres M, Niromanesh S, Mehran A, Rahiminia T. Effect of halogen light stimulation on nonreactive pattern of nonstress test (NST). Hayat 2011; 17(2):79. (Persian).
  6. Bartnicki J, Dudenhausen JW. Antepartum vibroacoustic stimulation in patients with low fetal heart rate variability. Int J Gynecol Obstet 1995; 48(2):173-7.
  7. Rahimikian F, Rahiminia T, Modarres M, Mehran A. Comparison of halogen light and vibroacoustic stimulation on nonreactive fetal heart rate pattern. Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res 2013; 18(2):112-6.
  8. Caridi BJ, Bolnick JM, Fletcher BG, Rayburn WF. Effect of halogen light stimulation on nonstress testing. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004; 190(5):1470-2.
  9. Bolnick JM, Garcia G, Fletcher BG, Rayburn WF. Cross-over trial of fetal heart rate response to halogen light and vibroacoustic stimulation. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2006; 19(4):215-9.
  10. Grant-Beuttler M, Glynn LM, Salisbury AL, Davis EP, Holliday C, Sandman CA. Development of fetal movement between 26 and 36-weeks’ gestation in response to vibro-acoustic stimulation. Front Psychol 2011; 2:350.
  11. Pirhadi M. The effect of vibroacoustic stimulation and music on fetal movement. Int J Pediatr 2015; 3(5.1):903-8.
  12. Visser GH, Mulder EJ. The effect of vibro‐acoustic stimulation on fetal behavioral state organization. Am J Ind Med 1993; 23(4):531-9.
  13. Nyman M, Arulkumaran S, Jakobsson J, Westgren M. Vibro-acoustic stimulation in high-risk pregnancies; maternal perception of fetal movements, fetal heart rate and fetal outcome. J Perinat Med 1992; 20(4):267-74.
  14. Schwartz DB, Sherman SJ, Goyert GL, Fields P, Simkins S, Daoud Y. An evaluation of antenatal fetal acoustic stimulation. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1991; 40(2):97-103.
  15. Thanaboonyawat I, Wataganara T, Boriboonhiransarn D, Viboonchart S, Tontisirin P. Effect of halogen light in fetal stimulation for fetal well-being assessment. J Med Assoc Thai 2006; 89(9):1376-80.
  16. Modarres M, Ali MM, Haghani H, Arami R, Rahnama P. The conformity of BPP and vibroacoustic stimulation results in fetal non reactive non stress test. Tehran Univ Med J 2006; 64(9):46-54.
  17. Winn HN, Hobbins JC. Clinical maternal-fetal medicine. Florida: CRC Press; 2000.
  18. Ebrahimzadeh S, Golmakani N, Kabirian M, Shakeri MT. Study of correlation between maternal fatigue and uterine contraction pattern in the active phase of labour. J Clin Nurs 2012; 21(11-12):1563-9.
  19. Cunningham FG, Gant NF, Leveno KJ, Gilstrap LG, Hauth ZG. Wenstrom KD physiological changes in pregnang. Williams obstetrics. 21st ed. New York: McGrow-Hill Company; 2001. P. 234-5.
  20. Boby P. Multiple assessment techniques education antepartum fetal risk. Pediactr Ann 2003; 32:609.
  21. Smith CV, Phelan JP, Platt LD, Broussard P, Paul RH. Fetal acoustic stimulation testing: II. A randomized clinical comparison with the nonstress test. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1986; 155(1):131-4.
  22. Fanaroff AA, Martin RJ. Neonatal-perinatal medicine: diseases of the fetus and infant. New York: Mosby; 2002.
  23. Hill WC. Ambulatory obstetrics. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2002.
  24. Walsh LV. Midwifery: community-based care during the childbearing year. New York: WB Saunders Company; 2001.
  25. Gibbs RS, Karlyn BY, Haney AF, Nygaard I. Danforth's obstetrics and gynecology. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2012.
  26. Boyer EW, Shannon M. The serotonin syndrome. N Engl J Med 2005; 352(11):1112-20.
  27. Saraçoğlu F, Göl K, Şahin İ, Türkkanı B, Öztopçu C. The predictive value of fetal acoustic stimulation. J Perinatol 1999; 19(2):103-5.
  28. Peleg D, Orvieto R, Sirota L, Ben-Rafael Z. Neonatal atrial flutter following fetal exposure to vibroacoustic stimulation. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 1999; 82(1):1-3.
The Iranian Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Infertility
Volume 21, Supplement
September 2018
Pages 94-104

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics