Episiotomy repair in continuous versus interrupted suturing technique in primiparous women: A Randomized clinical trial

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Associate Professor, Department of Midwifery, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Rafsanjan University of Medical Sciences, Rafsanjan, Iran.

2 Instructor, Department of Midwifery, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Rafsanjan University of Medical Sciences, Rafsanjan, Iran.

Abstract

Introduction: Episiotomy is associated with some complications such as pain, infection and discomfort of perineal sutures for mothers. This study was performed with aim to compare the complications of episiotomy repair in continuous versus interrupted suturing technique in primiparous women
Methods: This single blind randomized clinical trial study was performed in 2017-2018 on 140 primiparous women referred for vaginal delivery in Niknfas maternity hospital in Rafsanjan city. The subjects were randomly divided into two groups (n=70 in each group). Repair of episiotomy was done in one group with interrupted and in another group with continuous suturing technique. The tools were demographic and midwifery characteristics form, visual analog scale and surgical site infection. Pain severity score, analgesia use, wound infection and discomfort stitches were assessed 2 hours, 3-5 days, 2 and 6 weeks after delivery. Data were analyzed using SPSS software (version 22) and Chi-square, Independent-t and Mann-Whitney tests. P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Results: The pain severity score and discomfort stitches was lower in continuous group than interrupted group (p<0.05). Use of analgesia at these times was not significantly different between the two groups (p>0.05). Wound infection in 3-5 days and 2 weeks after delivery was lower in continuous group (p<0.05). Also, the repair time, number of threads and lidocaine used ampoules were less in the continuous method (p <0.05).
Conclusion: Pain intensity, discomfort stitches and episiotomy infection were less in continuous method compared to interrupted repair; it seems cost-effective due to less use of threads and analgesia.

Keywords

References

  1. Cunningham FG, Leveno KJ, Bloom SL, Dashe JS, Hoffman BL, Casey BM, et al. Williams Obstetrics. 25nd New York: McGraw-Hill Education; 2018.
  2. Gibbs RS, Karlan BY, Haney AF, Nygaard IE. Danforth's Obstetrics and Gynecology. 10nd Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer /Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2008.
  3. Fraser DM, Cooper MA. Myles' Textbook for Midwives.15nd Churchill Livingstone; 2009.
  4. Bharathi A, Reddy DD, Kote GS. A prospective randomized comparative study of vicryl rapide versus chromic catgut for episiotomy repair. Journal of clinical and diagnostic research: JCDR 2013; 7(2):326-30.
  5. Albers LL, Sedler KD, Bedrick EJ, Teaf D, Peralta P. Midwifery care measures in the second stage of labor and reduction of genital tract trauma at birth: a randomized trial. Journal of midwifery & women's health 2005; 50(5):365-72.
  6. McKinney ES, James SR, Murray SS, Nelson K, Ashwill J. Maternal-child nursing-e-book. Elsevier Health Sciences; 2017.
  7. Peter EA, Janssen PA, Grange CS, Douglas MJ. Ibuprofen versus acetaminophen with codeine for the relief of perineal pain after childbirth: a randomized controlled trial. Cmaj 2001; 165(9):1203-9.
  8. Bose E, Samant M, Lal P, Mishra S, Ghosh A. Comparison of impact of polyglactin 910 (Vicryl rapide) and chromic catgut sutures on perineal pain following episiotomy wound repair in eastern Indian patients. Journal of the Scientific Society 2013; 40(2):95-98.
  9. Makvandi S, Aminfar S. The effect of local gentamicin solution on episiotomy healing: a randomized controlled clinical trial. Iran J Obstet Gynecol Infertil 2014; 16(88):21-8.
  10. Azima S, Allahbakhshinasab P, Asadi N, Vaziri F. Comparison of early complications of episiotomy repair with rapid vicryl and chromic catgut in the nulliparous women. SSU_Journals. 2017; 25(8):595-602.
  11. Kettle C, Dowswell T, Ismail KM. Continuous and interrupted suturing techniques for repair of episiotomy or second‐degree tears. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2012(11).
  12. Hasanpoor S, Bani S, Shahgole R, Gojazadeh M. The effects of continuous and interrupted episiotomy repair on pain severity and rate of Perineal repair: a controlled randomized clinical trial. Journal of caring sciences 2012; 1(3):165-71.
  13. Tandon A, Deshpande A. Observational study of continuous versus interrupted suturing of episiotomy in rural population of India in terms of requirement of suture material and pain. Indian Journal of Basic and Applied Medical Research. 2015;4(4):524-8.
  14. Sereshti M, Gholamalishahi I, Moghadas M, Deris F. Comparison of perineal repair techniques of continuous and standard interrupted suturing in normal vaginal delivery. Journal of Shahrekord University of Medical Sciences 2011; 12(4):51-7.
  15. Kimbery K. The Neuromatrix Theory of pain. J Midwifery & Womens Health 2004; 49(6):482-88.
  16. Mohebi H, Abedian B, Moosavi Naeini SM, Fanaei SA. Comparision of Two Methods of Intrupted and Continuous in the Skin Closer on the Amount of Surgical Site Infection. J Kosar Med sci 2010; 14(1):43-7.
  17. Aslam R, Khan SA, Amir F. Interrupted Versus Continuous Sutures for Repair of Episiotomy or 2n Degree Perineal Tears. Journal of Ayub Medical College, Abbottabad: JAMC 2015; 27(3):680-3.
  18. Morano S, Mistrangelo E, Pastorino D, Lijoi D, Costantini S, Ragni N. A randomized comparison of suturing techniques for episiotomy and laceration repair after spontaneous vaginal birth. Journal of minimally invasive gynecology 2006; 13(5):457-62.
  19. Almeida SF, Riesco ML. Randomized controlled clinical trial on two perineal trauma suture techniques in normal delivery. Revista latino-americana de enfermagem 2008; 16:272-9.
  20. Valenzuela P, Saiz Puente MS, Valero JL, Azorin R, Ortega R, Guijarro R. Continuous versus interrupted sutures for repair of episiotomy or second‐degree perineal tears: a randomised controlled trial. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology 2009; 116(3):436-41.
  21. Kokanalı D, Ugur M, Kokanalı MK, Karayalcın R, Tonguc E. Continuous versus interrupted episiotomy repair with monofilament or multifilament absorbed suture materials: a randomised controlled trial. Archives of gynecology and obstetrics 2011; 284(2):275-80.
The Iranian Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Infertility
Volume 24, Issue 9
October 2021
Pages 16-23

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics